Am 04.07.2011 14:00, schrieb Andrea Aime: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Matthias Lendholt > <matthias.lendh...@gfz-potsdam.de > <mailto:matthias.lendh...@gfz-potsdam.de>> wrote: > > Am 03.07.2011 09:57, schrieb Jody Garnett: > > Well with the map layer work sorted out (thanks mbedward and aaime) I > > can return to what I wanted to work on after docs ... > > > > With that in mind I am going to break out gt-process with an eye > towards > > moving it to supported status. > > From my perspective as a gt-user that's good news! We are using the > Process interface for several internal processes and it's good to know > that in future this module will play a more active role in geotools. > > > Interesting. Did you try dropping those processes in a GeoServer? > They might work out of the box in WPS if they are registered in SPI and > use simple enough arguments and return values (privitives, grid coverages, > feature collections)
Unfortunately :-) we are using complex parameters. The java types are generated with xmlbeans out of our xsds. And then it the problems start to get these parameters running in generic WPS frameworks... I've already tested/tried some frameworks but had not enough time to get it running. Currently we are using the processes as lib in other projects but the idea is to have them running as WPS. Cheers, Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
