Even for direct layer it would be fine; they will usually return an empty
feature collection.
My plans are to back port from uDig:
- some kind of ScalebarLayer
- some kind of NorthArrowLayer
For GeoTools I was hoping we could make a GridLayer, IconLayer.
And I was hoping we could make an example of a tool using a direct layer for
visual feedback; rather than watching people make feature collections again and
again and again and again on the user list.
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 11 July 2011 at 7:07 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Hi Jody,
>
> Sorry for the late reply to this one...
>
> > Now here is a more interesting question ... should we move setStyle up to
> > the Layer class and remove StyleLayer as not interesting? Even if a layer
> > does not use SLD; the fact that it makes "something" available as features
> > main mean that a user would like to control how that "something" is
> > rendered?
>
> For all of the layer classes we have at present, other than
> DirectLayer, it would be fine. But what are your plans for DirectLayer
> ?
>
> Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
