Hi Jody, Andrea, I'm looking at the raster processes in relation to a couple this issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3855 which then inspired this one: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3857 I'd like to check if either of you have any problems with GEOT-3857 going ahead ? More generally, I wonder if there is any need to have a separate process.raster.gs package ? I plan to add a vector to raster function to jaitools (see http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3121 and http://code.google.com/p/jaitools/issues/detail?id=191) which would allow the existing VectorToRasterProcess class to be replaced. Once that is done the process.raster package will be empty. Another question, the process.raster.gs classes don't have a static process method. Is this a design decision ? I haven't caught up with the new API yet but perhaps it removes the need for static helper methods for direct use - is that the case ? Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
