On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 03:46:38 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Proposal here:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Function+lookup+using+qualified
> +Name
> 
> The good bits:
> 
> Expression expr2 = CQL.expression("se:interpolate( height, 0, '#109910',
> 255, '#80FF90','linear', 'color' )");
> 
> Marucio can you think of what would be needed to allow the ECQL parser to
> "expect" a ":" as part of parsing function name?
> 
> -- 
> Jody Garnett
Well,.., we need to implement the function rule in the parser and modify the 
current semantic action for functions to call the new api. New changes in the 
grammar requires an analysis of the syntax rules to avoid problem in a 
deterministic parsing process.

Question: I guess it is possible an function name like a:b:c:d(), (like 
properties name), isn't it?

cheers
-- 
Mauricio Pazos



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to