You got it right. In that case we would use a featureid. 

Let us relax that constraint so someone can make a Set<ResourceId>. 

--
Jody Garnett

On 26/10/2011, at 5:07 PM, Mark Leslie <mrk.les...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In taking the patch for a spin, we've found some test failures in gt-xsd-fes.
> 
> testParseId fails because the xml snippet being parsed contains a
> fes:ResourceId with no version attribute.  As per spec, this is
> acceptable, but the ResourceIdImpl requires a Version or date range.
> I have no problem with requiring a version, but we need some default
> behaviour in the case where it's not provided.  The spec seems to be
> silent on the matter, but my preference is to use LAST as the default.
> 
> Does this make sense, or am I coming at the problem from the right side?
> 
> 
> On a side note, GeoGIT proved no trouble and I now have a resourceid
> branch in my fork with the few changes needed.  Will worry about a
> pull request once these issues have been killed.
> 
> --
> Mark
> 
> 
> On 26 October 2011 01:36, Gabriel Roldan <grol...@opengeo.org> wrote:
>> I like it.
>> I don't expect it to be much of a trouble for  GeoGit. What we'll need to
>> review is the usage on the wfs2 versioning branch.
>> As for GeoGit, the main addition is ability to mix attribute/spatial query
>> with dataset history, instead of just one or the other through ResourceId,
>> which is much welcomed.
>> I'm looking forward to work on it (as I'd have to to update the wfs2-v
>> branch).
>> Cheers,
>> Gabriel
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the review Mark.
>>> I will check test cases again tomorrow (mostly in the xml bindings) and
>>> then I am ready to commit.
>>> I would kind of like feedback from Gabriel (I have already done everything
>>> he indicated was required; but an extra pair of eyes would be good).
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, 25 October 2011 at 4:01 PM, Mark Leslie wrote:
>>> 
>>> The code examples make things clearer :) I haven't managed to apply
>>> the patch to my local and see what the damage would be to GeoGIT, but
>>> that's still on my list. I expect nothing scary in that regard, but
>>> will let you know when I get that done.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mark Leslie
>>> Geospatial Software Architect
>>> LISAsoft
>>> 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Ph: +61 2 8570 5000 Fax: +61 2 8570 5099 Mob: +61
>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf 19-21 Pirrama Rd Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> LISAsoft is part of the A2end Group of Companies
>>> http://www.ardec.com.au
>>> http://www.lisasoft.com
>>> http://www.terrapages.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 24 October 2011 03:07, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Okay the Proposal is updated ... and more importantly an updated patch is
>>> provided against the Jira.
>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ResouceId
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3921
>>> This represents a good compromise; and has code examples of a few common
>>> queries, diagrams etc...
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>> 
>>> On Wednesday, 19 October 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> 
>>> Morning:
>>> I have a development team that has been working in a fork of GeoTools
>>> while
>>> the wfs2 and resoruceid concepts took shape. Justin has kindly merged in
>>> the
>>> wfs2 work (I still need to write some docs before it is done); and I have
>>> now written up a proposal for the ResourceId change.
>>> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ResouceId
>>> Since I have a development team waiting on this I will start work on
>>> Monday;
>>> and would like to collect any input people feel is necessary before that
>>> time. The work should not take very long; there are however two options on
>>> the table.
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
>>> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
>>> Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
>>> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
>>> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
>>> Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
>>> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Gabriel Roldan
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn 
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to