Sounds good. And the same general pattern could be used in the future with
other FactoryFinders to filter out other sorts of plugins. +1

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Works for me. Would the ProcessFilter also be plugged-in at the SPI
> level?
>
> Yep, that's what I was thinking.
> We could have that added programmatically by a
> Processors.addFilter(...)/removeFilter(...)
> methods.
>
> Both would work for me. Actually the programmatic way looks a bit
> better, more control
> and freedom to add the hooks whenever one wants in the user
> application lifecycle.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Tech lead
>
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax:      +39 0584 962313
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
> http://twitter.com/geowolf
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to