I would love to see us more officially embrace openjdk but I agree with
Andrea it is a resourcing issue that requires someone to take the time to
setup a buildbot. Then there is the question of how much we are actually
prepared to support it. Say someone sets up a buildbot and we start setting
breakages that do not occur on the main build bot? Do we consider those
blocker? A decision for the PSC i guess.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>wrote:
> My memory matches yours.
>
> So I recommend we check around for a build box with OpenJDK 6 - or we drop
> the geotools projects out of the "live dvd" - or we let them included it
> with a note that it is not a supported configuration.
>
>
> Jody
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
