On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Gabriel Roldan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think one way would be to port the wfs http handling to geotools'
> HTTPClient. Then it should be easier to mock up HTTPClient and parse
> whatever is meant to be sent as POST on the test case.
> The wfs-ng module on my wfs-ng branch does that, and goes beyond that by
> relying on geotools' AbstractOWSService (or whatever it was called) just as
> the wms and wcs clients. Unfortunately its far from complete so I guess for
> the sake of stability it would be easier to port the current wfs client?
>
Even in that case it would be more work than I can handle, the simple http
server is more or less what I can
afford (time on this one is quite limited).
Unless we tag team and share the work, someone does the switch to
HttpClient while I work on making
the requests always valid in the two protocol implementations?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
