On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. I guess the potential pitfall is any code that is
> relying on an unsafe conversion. In this case do you need the conversion to
> return null (ie fail to convert) or do you need it engage with the correct
> (safe conversion)? If the latter perhaps a two pass approach might work in
> which first a safe conversion is tried and then a second unsafe is tried
> only if the safe path failed. I have seen this approach used in other
> places.
Converters allow for both type of conversions by default, and disable the
unsafe ones only
on demand when , there is an example in NumericConverterFactory where the
safe converter
factory is created only if ConverterFactory.SAFE_CONVERSION is provided
with a value of true,
otherwise the unsafe one is created.
My plan was to mimic that, and have the process factories dealing with
annotated processes
use only safe conversions
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
