On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> My impression for the logging engines is that we were always marking the
> dependency "as provided" (and thus not bloating).
> If the implementation is available at runtime, GeoTools can be configured
> to make use of it.
>
Ah, you have a point there.
Yeah, even if I'm keen to break apart "main" some day (it is doing too
much, and has a number of stuff that is not very
often used) I agree going with the provided dependency is probably the best
course of action, adding one module
for one class is probably overkill
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
