On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michael Bedward <[email protected]
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry - the build failure is my fault. Using a JTS 1.13 method on the
> 8.x branch which is still working with JTS 1.12.
>
> What do you think would be best: upgrade 8.x to JTS 1.13 (which has
> been fine for 9.x for the last month or so) or just downgrade my unit
> tests ?
>
Sorry for the late answer.
One one side, I believe upgrading JTS is low risk, so it's most likely
suitable for the stable series.
On the other side... wouldn't it be better if we give some incentive to
people
to upgrade to the next version of GeoTools?
You know, so that there is a large list of benefits in the upgrade to
compensate
for the periodic API changes that we make, so that users are tempted to
upgrade
more often and as a result don't get too much of a difference between the
various
GeoTools series?
It also goes in line with the idea that new features are done on trunk, and
that
it requires a vote to backport them to the stable series.
Anyways, just a thought I wanted to share, I'm fine either way.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
