I think that's a good point Andrea. Let's leave 8.x with JTS 1.12 making GeoTools 9.x just that little bit sweeter.
Michael On 23 January 2013 05:52, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for the late answer. > One one side, I believe upgrading JTS is low risk, so it's most likely > suitable for the stable series. > > On the other side... wouldn't it be better if we give some incentive to > people > to upgrade to the next version of GeoTools? > You know, so that there is a large list of benefits in the upgrade to > compensate > for the periodic API changes that we make, so that users are tempted to > upgrade > more often and as a result don't get too much of a difference between the > various > GeoTools series? > It also goes in line with the idea that new features are done on trunk, and > that > it requires a vote to backport them to the stable series. > > Anyways, just a thought I wanted to share, I'm fine either way. > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > == > Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more > information. > == > > Ing. Andrea Aime > @geowolf > Technical Lead > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 339 8844549 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
