On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Chris Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm very concerned by this too. It sucks to not get contributions from
> Google. But it's even worse as an indicator of things that may scare off
> others who are similar.
>
> I'd be very much in favor of just using the Apache one, and moving to it
> quickly. To reiterate for all, this is just for the contribution agreement.
> We could adapt the Apache one to so it assigns copyright to LGPL pretty
> easily I imagine. So we're not talking about changing the license, just the
> way the license gets assigned to GeoTools.
>
Pretty much agree, very much +1 on this one
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
