On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Chris Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at it I think it needs to be as complicated as your questions
> imply.
>
> You don't need to set a target amount. People just post the incentive for
> what it is worth to them. If no one fixes then no one does.
>
I can be ok with the rest, but this point seems really weird to me.
Like, I would never allocate money on a ticket without knowing what the
total amount needed to solve the issue is?
Do you think the funding for OL3 would have gone well if they did not set
an expectation beforehand?
Given that every bug fix needs a test, probably a backport to the stable
series, and if it's not the maintainer doing the work,
a review, I'd say there is no such a thing like a 100$ fix that people
could just carelessly put money against.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
