Option (b) is correct. If we ever run maven site it uses this information
to create a "nice" report of all of these kind of details.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Brett Walker
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I see that there are many instance of the following fragment throughout
> the poms in GeoTools.
>
> <scm>
> <connection>
> scm:svn:http://svn.geotools.org/trunk/.../.../.../
> </connection>
> <url>http://svn.geotools.org/trunk/.../.../.../</url>
> </scm>
>
> What is the status of this fragment? We don't use SVN as our repository
> any more.
>
> a) Should it be removed?
> b) Should it be replaced with an appropriate GIT alternative, if
> possible?
> c) Or should it be retained for historical purposes but made a comment?
>
> I'm wondering what should be done with it? opinions please.
>
> Brett
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
