Hi,
the random fill support has been on trunk for a few weeks now without
causing
troubles, so I would like to back-port it to the stable branch.

Now, the unwritten rule would be to wait a month, which still hasn't passed
(the
deadline would be Nov 4th), but I believe it's better to backport sooner
and see
if there is any issue in the stable series, instead of waiting and
discovering
eventual troubles closer to next month release.
Not that I expect any, the random fill support is pretty well factored out
in its
own support classes.

Opinions?

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to