Not really worried one way or another. I ran into a few glitches with UOM,
but I expect they were due to the CSS module.
Are any API changes involved?
Jody Garnett
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to backport the changes to support a local uom for each
> property.
> The support for "px" is a bugfix related to a missing bit of the SLD 1.1
> spec,
> supporting also "m" and "ft" per property is an extension instead.
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4614
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/314
>
> Objections, concerns?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39 339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
