On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Niels Charlier <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am also asking this question because I am adding those parameters Andrea
> was talking about and I was wondering if I should also change their name or
> not.
>
> If the idea is that wfs-ng replaces wfs with the same parameter
> configuration...
>
Hmm... eh, I cannot think of a nice way, I was about to suggest parsing
both the old and new
names, while advertising only the new ones, but that will still have issues
with the auto-generated GeoServer config UI, which will not show
the old names anymore.
At the GeoServer level that could be solved by also creating a custom WFS
config UI that knows about the old
and new names, much like we have a custom UI for shapefiles, in GeoServer.
Not sure how uDig will handle that though, maybe the uDig devs just don't
care about
preserving backwards compatibility on existing projects?
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
