Hi Jeroen,
I have checked your pull request and your tests but I didn't understand
where the problem is.
You are configuring a mosaic made of 2 granules
10,70 -------- 30,70 35,70 -------- 55,70
| | | |
| | | |
| | *&* | |
| | | |
| | | |
10,40 -------- 30,40 35,40 -------- 55,40
Then, you are requesting the full bbox so you are getting back both of them.
Not sure why you should get back just one of them, since they are 2
different files/granules composing the result.
Are you really sure that the test you added on the pull request is
replicating the issue you are referring to?
If affirmative, I think that this is not an issue. but it's the expected
behaviour.
Please, Let me know.
Regards,
Daniele
.
So
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Daniele Romagnoli
Senior Software Engineer
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Daniele Romagnoli <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Jeroen,
> I have seen that JIRA.
> I'll take a look on this as soon as I can.
>
> Thanks again for having set it up
> Cheers,
> Daniele.
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Daniele Romagnoli
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Jeroen Dries <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniele,
>>
>>
>>
>> I created a JIRA issue:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6564
>>
>>
>>
>> I also created a unit test, which mimicks my setup, and exposes the issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/639
>>
>>
>>
>> It took my a bit of time, but I hope I can reuse this unit test setup in
>> the future to illustrate other issues. In fact it also a nice demonstration
>> of a complex multi dimensional setup.
>>
>>
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Jeroen
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 02 July 2014 16:42:57 Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jeroen,
>>
>> > If you also have a small sample mosaic (configuration and data) and a
>>
>> > request to replicate it, to be attached to JIRA, they would be very
>> helpful
>>
>> > for debugging and fixing it.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Cheers,
>>
>> > Daniele
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > ==
>>
>> > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>>
>> > http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
>>
>> > ==
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Ing. Daniele Romagnoli
>>
>> > Senior Software Engineer
>>
>> >
>>
>> > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>
>> > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>>
>> > 55054 Massarosa (LU)
>>
>> > Italy
>>
>> > phone: +39 0584 962313
>>
>> > fax: +39 0584 1660272
>>
>> >
>>
>> > http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>
>> > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> >
>>
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >
>>
>> > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jeroen Dries <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > > Hi all,
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > I'm seeing some strange behaviour in WCSDimensionsSubsetHelper in
>>
>> > > combination
>>
>> > > with a multi-dimensional mosaic:
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > ->In the splitRequest method, all of the granules are queried for a
>> given
>>
>> > > bounding box, and set of dimensions. In the case of a mosaic, a
>> granule
>>
>> > > exists
>>
>> > > for each tile in the mosaic, and for each dimension.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > So for example if my bounding box covers 2 tiles, and my dimension
>> range
>>
>> > > also
>>
>> > > intersects with 2 discrete values, I get 4 granules in total.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > -> Next the weird thing happens, for all of the 4 granules, a new
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > subrequest
>>
>> > > is made. The bounding box remains the original bounding box, but the
>> value
>>
>> > > for
>>
>> > > the dimension is correctly extracted from the granule.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > The result is that in the final output, I now have 2 identical pairs
>> of
>>
>> > > coverages, which seems wrong.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > I hope that this description is a bit clear, if no one objects, I'll
>> log
>>
>> > > this
>>
>> > > in Jira.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Not sure what the right solution is, perhaps the subRequests can be
>> stored
>>
>> > > in
>>
>> > > a Set, so that only unique requests are retained...
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > best regards,
>>
>> > > Jeroen
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > > ---- Open source business process management suite built on Java and
>>
>> > > Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM
>>
>> > > Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into
>>
>> > > organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
>>
>> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
>>
>> > > _______________________________________________
>>
>> > > GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>
>> > > [email protected]
>>
>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
