Hi Sampo,
Your testing is important actually, so that we can be absolutely 100%
sure there is no regression with regards to your work.
For WFS2.0/GML3.2 I use the geotools PullParser rather than the
gt-wfs-ng's own internal parser. I think ideally we should get rid of
the internal parser all together, but that requires more work to make
sure we do not introduce any regressions in the older wfs/GML versions
since there are some specifics implemented in that internal parser.
Next release would of course be great but I am not sure how realistic
that is. For me personally I don't really mind if this change is
postponed until next release if we need more time to perfect it, as long
as we can move forward with integrating this work shortly. If others are
enthousiastic about integrating this in the next stable release, I am
available to do what it is possible.
Regards
Niels
On 14-01-15 14:51, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Hi,
This is really good timing. We just noticed some issues regarding GML
feature parsing when using my cascaded stored query support. I'll try
your branch tomorrow and report back. In the meanwhile I'd like to
know if you are proposing this feature for the next stable release?
Sampo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be
<mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote:
Hello List,
I finished something I started last year but never finished:
enable WFS
2.0 in the wfs-ng module. Some of the work I had already prepared was
sitting in a separate branch called wfs-ng-improvements-2.0. Some
of the
work done in this branch had in the meantime been done a second
time by
Sampo Savolainen. I took me quite a bit of work merging with the
latest
version, because some things were done differently with the same
purpose. I removed most of that stuff from my version, attempting to
keep only improvements from my work.
I managed to get WFS 2.0 getfeature requests to work in wfs-ng now
though, with preservations: it has been tested only with geoserver as
server and not extensively). But it looks very promising. I have
made a
pull request for this.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/681
Transactions do not yet work, but I believe they can made to work as
well with very minor changes. The wfs-ng module's unit tests are a bit
of a mess though, this requires more work. I created tests for some of
the specific issues that I solved, but the "whole" (testing getfeature
in wfs 2.0 for different servers) is still to be done properly.
Kind Regards
Niels
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in
Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
--
Sampo Savolainen
R&D Director, Spatineo Oy
sampo.savolai...@spatineo.com <mailto:sampo.savolai...@spatineo.com>
+358-407555649
Linnankoskenkatu 16 A 17, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
www.spatineo.com <http://www.spatineo.com>, twitter.com/#!/spatineo
<http://twitter.com/#%21/spatineo>
www.linkedin.com/company/spatineo-inc
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/spatineo-inc>
This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.
If you
have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
may not use, copy, disseminate, or distribute it; do not open any
attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
promptly by e-mail that you have done so.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
