On 27-02-15 11:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be
<mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote:
Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the
detailed explanation, Ben.
But my question remains: should gt-epsg-wkt be allowed to produce the
wrong CRS in the first place?
As far as I remember gt-espg-wkt always had east/north orientation in
all CRS,
and people keep on using it like this.
I'm afraid changing the axis order now would break all existing users of
this module (e.g., I know of GeoServer customizations that use it
instead of
epsg-hsql because they don't want databases to be created around, and
they don't give a damn about OGC/EPSG axis order, they actually want
everything
east/north)
Isn't it unlikely that those users use the URI syntax. The geotools
documentation claims that when you use the URI syntax the result is
always perfectly predictable... quod non.
Regards
Niels
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
