Success! Build #3 passed without any extra JVM args. Was the extra memory really needed? A mystery.
On 15/10/16 12:44, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > This fixed the build. We have some new commits on 16.x, so I have undone > this change to see if the deploy step passes without it. > > On 15/10/16 10:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Failed in the deploy step. I set -Xmx1024m and kicked it. I seem to >> recall that new builds sometimes require a little help (and more memory) >> to get past the first build. We can then remove the JVM option. >> >> On 15/10/16 05:18, moni...@boundlessgeo.com wrote: >>> See <http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/job/geotools-16.x/1/> >> > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
