Success! Build #3 passed without any extra JVM args. Was the extra 
memory really needed? A mystery.

On 15/10/16 12:44, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> This fixed the build. We have some new commits on 16.x, so I have undone
> this change to see if the deploy step passes without it.
> On 15/10/16 10:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>> Failed in the deploy step. I set -Xmx1024m and kicked it. I seem to
>> recall that new builds sometimes require a little help (and more memory)
>> to get past the first build. We can then remove the JVM option.
>> On 15/10/16 05:18, wrote:
>>> See <>

Ben Caradoc-Davies <>
Transient Software Limited <>
New Zealand

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites,!
GeoTools-Devel mailing list

Reply via email to