Success! Build #3 passed without any extra JVM args. Was the extra 
memory really needed? A mystery.

On 15/10/16 12:44, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> This fixed the build. We have some new commits on 16.x, so I have undone
> this change to see if the deploy step passes without it.
>
> On 15/10/16 10:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>> Failed in the deploy step. I set -Xmx1024m and kicked it. I seem to
>> recall that new builds sometimes require a little help (and more memory)
>> to get past the first build. We can then remove the JVM option.
>>
>> On 15/10/16 05:18, moni...@boundlessgeo.com wrote:
>>> See <http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/jenkins/job/geotools-16.x/1/>
>>
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to