I thought it was named "build" :)

--
Jody Garnett

On 6 October 2017 at 10:02, Torben Barsballe <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Excellent.
>
> I believe it is named apollo internally. We just need to start using the
> name, so that everyone knows what we are talking about when someone says
> "apollo".
>
> Torben
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Ian Turton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> OK I've pushed the release job on new build (we should name that machine)
>> - I'll see how it goes
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On 6 October 2017 at 17:54, Torben Barsballe <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> All 2.12.x cite tests now passing on ares. Jody posted the revision info
>>> above, but here it is again:
>>>
>>> version = 2.12-SNAPSHOT
>>> git revision = bc18e09993a30c93f37b7e33e7c54c32b17e014b
>>> git branch = origin/2.12.x
>>> build date = 06-Oct-2017 15:52
>>> geotools version = 18-SNAPSHOT
>>> geotools revision = 3f5dbf634c4a6b24476643cc7cf7d2b22747fcf5
>>> geowebcache version = 1.12-SNAPSHOT
>>> geowebcache revision = 5b516f3adc0f82e42f342ba83b5fc9a353d575d2/5b516
>>>
>>>
>>> Torben
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Torben Barsballe <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the 2.11 cite tests on the new build server, they are
>>>> failing (although reporting success) for a different reason than the jar 
>>>> (curl:
>>>> (7) Failed to connect to localhost port 11010 - looks like an issue
>>>> starting up geoserver or the cite server). So I expect once we get the
>>>> jar for the 2.12.x cite tests, they will just be failing in a different
>>>> way. It seems like each time one of the cite test issues get fixed, there
>>>> is another one underneath.
>>>>
>>>> Torben
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Ian Turton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Torben
>>>>>
>>>>> I think all the cite tests on the new build server need is one jar
>>>>> installed
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 October 2017 at 17:27, Torben Barsballe <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6 October 2017 at 09:00, Torben Barsballe <tbarsballe@boundles
>>>>>> sgeo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running the cite tests on ares and the build on the new build server
>>>>>>> works fine, from past experience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we run cite tests on ares to verify the revision numbers, and
>>>>>>> then make the release on build.geoserver.org ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Torben
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6 October 2017 at 09:00, Torben Barsballe <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ian,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks like the cite tests on the new build server still need a
>>>>>>>> bit more work before they are functional; Jody, Nick, Justin, and Ben 
>>>>>>>> seem
>>>>>>>> to be arranging something to look into that; but that probably won't 
>>>>>>>> be in
>>>>>>>> time for the release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Given that, best bet is probably to use ares. I was hoping we could
>>>>>>>> avoid creating the 2.12 jobs on ares as well, but I guess that is not 
>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>> to be the case. I've created a 2.12.x nightly on ares, and kicked off
>>>>>>>> another batch of cite tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Running the cite tests on ares and the build on the new build
>>>>>>>> server works fine, from past experience.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Torben
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Ian Turton <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I said in another message the cite-tests currently don't run on
>>>>>>>>> the new build server. I just tried to run the cite tests on ares but 
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> won't work as there is no geoserver-12.x build configured. I'm loathe 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> set up a complete 2.12.x build on ares as we are trying to move away 
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> it and I'm not sure what the possible interactions are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So if someone with a fixed IP address can fix the new build server
>>>>>>>>> up that would be great as currently all the cite tests currently 
>>>>>>>>> claim to
>>>>>>>>> be passing but are in fact failing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Ian Turton
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ian Turton
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ian Turton
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to