> The PRs that I've sent do not just compile, they pass a full "mvn clean > install", that includes tests, > if you take the time to build every bit from sources, in turn. Not sure > how this got overlooked. >
It is more we did not have the information readily on hand, trying to assemble it now :) There is however one catch in the GeoServer one, everything builds in core > and extensions, however, while the security LDAP module builds, but the > tests are actually skipped because the embedded LDAP server used for tests > is not starting up (I'm guessing the config files are not compatible > anymore, but I'm not sure). We need an LDAP expert to fix it. > Will make a note > > The imageio-ext and GeoWebCache pull requests instead are ready to go, > they could be merged now on master. The GeoTools one had a few issues that > I fixed, it's ready to go too. Finally jai-ext goes through a full "mvn > install" without any change. > Do we want to merge each stage to master? or work on a jdk11 branch in each repository... > >> 1. >> >> Reduce warnings from Dependency Analysis Tools >> Get as much as possible build and run without warnings. >> 1. >> >> This cannot be automated, and is y we have so many people in the >> sprint! >> >> > The "fix" column advertises using "add-modules" as the solution, but there > might be better ways, > such as upgrading the dependencies or changing the code we're using. I > want to try and persue those before > giving up on what looks like a band-aid. > I copied that over from before, updating dependencies, or fixing our code, is what this stage is about. >> 1. >> >> org.opengis repackage >> Swich gt-api away from using org.opengis package, upgrade everything >> else to follow >> 1. >> >> repackage >> 2. >> >> update emf models and regenerate >> >> > Did anyone look at how to do this step? Newer version of Eclipse might > need EMF/XSD updates and possibly changes in the product structure, picking > the right version used to > generate each bit is quite messy. Last few times I did, could not get the > current Eclipse version to work, and had to do a history search and get the > Eclipse version that was "current" > when the EMF module in question was generated in order to modify the beans. > Have not looked yet, expect this task will fall to me as one of the few still using eclipse. "everyone can edit"... but everyone already can edit the docs, I assume > you're talking about the https://docs.geoserver.org/ > landing page right? > Yes, right now we reply on the build server running a script to unpack the docs for each release. Only a few boundless people had access to the docs.geoserver.org machine (in case that script went wrong). > > >> >> - >> >> https://sourcey.com/spectacle/ >> >> > The output of this looks better than Swagger imho. > It is node based, but generates static output. > >
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
