Looking at the diff that is indeed much more readable. I would like to help out and really focus on the docs and code examples.
Do you have specific examples that you did not know how to fix that you could point me at? On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 2:23 AM Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi, > looking at the build scrolling by, it's not hard to notice the Java > compiler warning about unchecked > conversions with generic types... they are pretty much everywhere. > > So I've started experimenting on a branch, making the unchecked warning an > error (just like deprecation) > and fixing it. As usual, the idea would be to fix all warnings, large PR, > and then enable the check for good, > for everyone. > > As with other cases, I'm taking a modest approach: fix what's easy to fix, > suppress the rest (there are a bunch > of cases that cannot be fixed, and many that I don't really know how to > fix, even after re-reading the Java tutorial > on generics). > > While I was at it, I've noticed a lot of cases where using the diamond > operator could make the code more compact, > and in many cases, more readable (especially with the 80 columns limit > google-java-format imposes). > PMD has a check for that, so I've added it. With lots of old code, we have > a ton of declarations with type arguments > that can be replaced by generics. Using IntelliJ inspections it's not hard > to find and replace them all, and it can > be possibly automated with some regular expressions (something capturing > "new Identifier<type args here>". > > I've did the cleanups on the first few modules in the build (up to, and > including, gt-metadata) and pushed them on this branch: > https://github.com/aaime/geotools/tree/qa_unchecked > and also made a draft PR for people to look at the diffs: > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3043 > > Opinions? Worried that big bad generics might come and bite you? (well > yes, they will) > Anyone interested in helping? (we can split by module, or even by project) > > Cheers > Andrea > > == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit > http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf > Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Via+di+Montramito+3%2FA%0D%0A55054++Massarosa?entry=gmail&source=g> > (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 > http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > ------------------------------------------------------- *Con riferimento > alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - > Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni > circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali > allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i > destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per > errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le > sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended > only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from > disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 > “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information > herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > _______________________________________________ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel