Attending Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett Jukka Rahkonen Torben Barsballe Kevin Smith Actions from last meeting: - [DONE] Torben: Vote on Datastore Parameter proposal - All: Volunteer for releases - [DONE] 2.18.1 in November, 2.17.4 in December Agenda 1. Travis CI replacement 2. December release volunteer 3. Unchecked branches status update 4. Java 11 modules units issue 5. Releasing or fixing an old branch Actions - Jody: Create Ticket/Wiki for tracking Travis CI replacement https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Travis-builds - Andrea: ask for a December release volunteer on list Travis CI replacement Cost of using Travis CI vs cost of migrating builds. What do we need to migrate: - GeoServer → java 8, java 11, and QA builds - GeoTools → java 8, java 11, and QA builds - Linux environment available in github actions so this can be migrated - These should be “simple” to migrate, nothing complicated - GeoTools database builds - sqlserver, oracle, mysql 5, mysql 8 - GeoServer documentation build - requires sphinx, so “not simple” - GeoTools documentation build - Note: unlikely to be effective, as sphinx not installed - GeoServer package build - Should be “simple” to migrate Options: - Pay Travis - We have budget, we could look at value for paying - github Actions - Databases make of well-known service “postgis service”,is there an equivalent for Oracle, sqlserver and mysql 5/8? - Also worried about using only one tool, and everyone is switching to them. - Jenkins - The approach of adding a jenkins pipeline build to repository is important to allow anyone to work on this - Circle CI, we have had mixed success with the Windows build, and there is a time limit (think 50 minutes). GeoNode is using CircleCI. Apparently we’d get 4 concurrent builds for Linux <https://circleci.com/blog/optimizing-open-source-projects-on-circleci/#:~:text=Parallelism%20is%20available%20if%20you,as%20they%20use%20more%20resources.> . - Azure Pipelines is also an option. GDAL migrated to GitHub Actions with https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3194 and https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3198 December release volunteer https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule Need a volunteer. Let’s ask on the list. Unchecked branches status update GeoTools: merged! Instructions here: https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/conventions/code/qa.html#javac GeoWebCache: merged! GeoServer: ongoing. https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/4567 Andrea currently working on WFS. EMF models source of warnings as collections have no generics in place, for the time being, they are being suppressed (IntelliJ seems to have a cleanup removing unnecessary annotations, if we fix the EMF models later). GeoTools Java 11 modules units issue Coming down to NetCDF use of units preventing startup: - Previously a hack using reflection was used to configure a DefaultFormatter - We need a new approach Ongoing PR (breaks existing tests, removes code that can parse NetCDF units) https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3232 (nope!) Some notes on how to possibly handle it in the javadoc of the class: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util/GeoToolsUnitFormat.java#L58 And in this ticket: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6709 https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-se/issues/201 We updated to Indriya 2.0.2 earlier in the year: - https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/indriya Discussion: - Can this fix be confined just to netCDF? I know units are used in more locations …. Nope. - GeoToolsUnitsFormatter may need to wrap, rather than configure, .. but may not have required visibility access - Need someone familiar with units to do the job, might need funding Releasing or fixing an old branch Given funding it’s not a problem, it’s just not easy given how many things changed. Jody would like to release: - GT 19.x / GWC 1.13.x / GS 2.13.x - I do not want to bother folks with pull-request against these - Some build changes to osgeo repo needed Q: Do we backport between all the releases? 22.x, 21.x, 20.x .. 19.x? Not needed, PRs to 19.x can be clear … anyone needing 20.x can cherry-pick if needed to get that branch to build again also.
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
