GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2021-02-02Attending Torben Barsballe
Jody Garnett Kevin Smith Jukka Rahkonnen Nils Bühner Andrea Aime Alessandro Parma Actions from last meeting: - [IDone] Torben: Write dependency backport details a bit more clearly in our developer guide Agenda 1. Module graduation GSIPs 2. Terrestris graduation to “experienced provider” 3. Docker image 4. QA effort update 5. Java 11 indriya upgrade Actions - Module graduation GSIPs https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Proposals - GWC-S3: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-193 - Docs look good! - Keep in mind download directive when migrating docs to extension. - Params-extractor module: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-194 - Q: Does this get added as a service page (under WMS?) or an extra tab on the WMS service page? A: Not clear for docs, … okay it shows up in settings - Incoming: WPS download https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/community/wps-download/index.html - Discussion on download animation etc... - Incoming: WMTS multidim: https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/community/wmts-multidimensional/index.html Keep in mind: - When graduating PR and moving docs to extension, change from `download_community` to `download_extension` directive (which adjusts link between latest/stable/maintenance), see config.py for details <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/doc/en/user/source/conf.py#L117-L119> OGC API Modules - Graduation Discussion (Maybe for GS 2.20?) - How to fulfil criteria of 3 production sites? - Waive this requirement since this is new functionality? No. - Not many people are using these modules yet, and not in production - Wait until someone is actually using these in production; re-evaluate in the future - Clients for ogc-api-features? - Ian started one, ogr started something ... Terrestris graduation to “experienced provider” - Reference: http://geoserver.org/support/ - Email: has a solid list of activities, ... Q: What is an experienced provider? - Jody is of the strong opinion that must contribute to sustainability (not only user / customer focus). - Andrea: points out this is not clear on our website ... Actions: - Jody: Propose clarification of definition, and contact existing experienced providers Q: What contribution have they made to GeoServer / GWC or GeoTools? Goal with experienced providers is to recognize folks that have been through the GSIP or proposal process to contribute functionality to the code-base (rather than just consulting on setup GeoServer and understand how to use it). Community module: - https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/community/geostyler/index.html - https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3607 - https://github.com/geoserver/docker/pull/1 - Can this go to extension? No, does not really look maintained. See history: - https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commits/master/src/community/geostyler/src/main https://www.terrestris.de/en/openstreetmap-wms/ demo? - 502 Bad Gateway! - Aside: This would be great opportunity for osgeo.org website (which needs a map done by osgeo software) Q: Can bug fixes count? Perhaps … links? Q: Security maintenance signup? Yep that is a solid Docker image updates Two PRs for docker image, how do we want to continue? Different focuses, dockerfile to extend adjust vs docker image to use right away. Q: Maybe it’s possible to merge them? - Perhaps as a build option? Please start with one, and ship to the public! - And then improve over time :) - March 1st Release Candidate ← opportunity ! Discussion: - Discuss on pull request, or issue - Perhaps make a wiki page or github issue to compare the two approaches - Docker wiki page is empty : https://github.com/geoserver/docker/wiki QA effort update gt-http client is merged (yay) so pmd fixes can go ahead… - 1000+ files modified <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3311>, merged yesterday :) - Varargs: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3317 - We have very few array of primitives (only real problem around) - Jody really likes the readability / usability improvement here - anonymous inner class migration to lambdas: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3318 https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/4656 - Mixed: when it is good it is good, when it is bad it is confusing - Feature visitors is much better - File filters / filename filters / Runnables also great - Wicket tend to almost more confusing Bradh: This looks like it never worked :) Two modules removed: - gt-arcsde - gt-validation Note: - gt-graph was a lot of work to update, is it still used now that gt-validation is removed? … - Graph visitors look better with lambdas Java 11 indriya upgrade This work can be done, .. but is hard to find time. - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3232 - https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/indriya/pull/317 - Fixe is merged, waiting on release - These unit libraries are not always setup to be extended (why not?) To prevent this kind of error, can we set up java 11 docs to use the module system? - This would catch most of the problems? - Maven “toolchains” can also be setup to run tests with different JDK versions in a single build - https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jsplitpkgscan-maven-plugin - https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jsplitpkgscan
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
