Hi Andrea,

Last time I tried I got the "license exceeded for geotools" error from
Jira/Atlassian. Today, when I try to login, I get a parachute, with text
"Joining Jira. Hang on a sec...", which is later appended by a "try again" 
button.
I tried that three times, all the same affect. First going to OSgeo
(left upper home button) I get a localized message stating that
"our team is notified, if the problem persist, please contact Atlassian 
support".
This is the code that attached to that bubble text: "ERROR: 18VOQVT". Reloading
the same thing.

I get the the list of issues, but the left frame remains blank with an "error"
road sign.

I have no trouble logging into atlassian root, I have an account. (Unless
those are different realms - but then I don't know how to apply for an account
for geotools.) The account is keyed to this email address.

Sorry.

Michael

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:58:38PM +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> anyone should be able to create a Jira ticket, given an account (which can
> also be freely created).
> Did you create the account and it still does not work?
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:01 PM Michael Jung <m...@golem.phantasia.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > Issued a pull request. I couldn't issue a Jira issue accordingly, license
> > issues it says.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:05:42AM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > > Not really, you can also make such a method package visible (which
> > > depending on your viewpoint on encapsulation is slightly less visible
> > than
> > > protected).
> > > --
> > > Jody Garnett
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 11:55, Michael Jung <m...@golem.phantasia.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I guess hanging out means waiting here?
> > > > I think, I can extract another private method, turn it protected and
> > test
> > > > it. (Is there a better approach to test private methods these days?)
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:11:46PM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > > > > I am not that familiar with image workers myself, I think we should
> > hang
> > > > > out for a bit and ask for help in how to write test cases.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jody Garnett
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 03:39, Michael Jung <m...@golem.phantasia.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I understand your policy, and I have tried complying. However, it
> > is
> > > > > > not that simple.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The scale method is deeply entrenched in the ImageWorker and
> > testing
> > > > > > this safety check would require me to refactor a lot of code that
> > > > > > I am not familiar with - or to reverse engineer my "big"
> > > > > > example until I find the parameter-set on class level that causes
> > the
> > > > > > problem. The first has the danger of introducing new bugs and the
> > > > latter
> > > > > > is hideously difficult, as you may imagine. At least it is not
> > worth
> > > > > > the effort for such an unproblematic safety check.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sorry that this is beyond my ability. Would you still take a
> > pull
> > > > > > request?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:18:10PM -0700, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > > > > > > Thanks for contacting us, it appears your fix is good safety
> > check.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We do have the policy of only accepting pull requests with a test
> > > > case;
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > prevent regressions from occurring and prove to the review that
> > the
> > > > > > change
> > > > > > > addresses the issue in questions. We have had too much technical
> > debt
> > > > > > > accumulate before this policy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We would love if if you can make a PR.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jody
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:37 AM Michael Jung <
> > > > m...@golem.phantasia.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I sent a similar mail a couple of months ago. I didn't receive
> > any
> > > > > > > > response,
> > > > > > > > but I had only recently subscribed, maybe it got lost in
> > > > translation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The CONTRIBUTING.md says, I should post here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A lot of my data is raster data with alpha-channel. About 2%
> > fail
> > > > when
> > > > > > > > serving them through the tile server at some resolutions.  I
> > can't
> > > > > > > > produce a small, self-contained example, unfortunately. But I
> > have
> > > > > > > > tracked it down and it seems the alpha-channel is rendered
> > > > separately
> > > > > > > > from the rest of the image and is "allergic" to 0-size
> > tile-width.
> > > > > > > > This is the way I fixed it in 21.1 (verified in my
> > environment).
> > > > > > > > If necessary, I can give you the stack trace from the logs, the
> > > > > > > > AWT class doesn't like 0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the patch on current main HEAD:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > a/modules/library/coverage/src/main/java/org/geotools/image/ImageWorker.java
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > b/modules/library/coverage/src/main/java/org/geotools/image/ImageWorker.java
> > > > > > > > index 0dfee3e..82c0d3f 100644
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > a/modules/library/coverage/src/main/java/org/geotools/image/ImageWorker.java
> > > > > > > > +++
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > b/modules/library/coverage/src/main/java/org/geotools/image/ImageWorker.java
> > > > > > > > @@ -4452,15 +4452,17 @@ public class ImageWorker {
> > > > > > > >              Object candidate =
> > hints.get(JAI.KEY_IMAGE_LAYOUT);
> > > > > > > >              if (candidate instanceof ImageLayout) {
> > > > > > > >                  ImageLayout layout = (ImageLayout) candidate;
> > > > > > > > -                ImageLayout layout2 =
> > > > > > > > -                        new ImageLayout2(
> > > > > > > > -
> > layout.getTileGridXOffset(null),
> > > > > > > > -
> > layout.getTileGridYOffset(null),
> > > > > > > > -                                layout.getTileWidth(null),
> > > > > > > > -                                layout.getTileHeight(null),
> > > > > > > > -                                sm,
> > > > > > > > -                                cm);
> > > > > > > > -                merged.setRenderingHints(new
> > > > > > > > RenderingHints(JAI.KEY_IMAGE_LAYOUT, layout2));
> > > > > > > > +                if (layout.getTileWidth(null) > 0 &&
> > > > > > > > layout.getTileHeight(null) > 0) {
> > > > > > > > +                    ImageLayout layout2 =
> > > > > > > > +                            new ImageLayout2(
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > layout.getTileGridXOffset(null),
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > layout.getTileGridYOffset(null),
> > > > > > > > +                                    layout.getTileWidth(null),
> > > > > > > > +
> > layout.getTileHeight(null),
> > > > > > > > +                                    sm,
> > > > > > > > +                                    cm);
> > > > > > > > +                    merged.setRenderingHints(new
> > > > > > > > RenderingHints(JAI.KEY_IMAGE_LAYOUT, layout2));
> > > > > > > > +                }
> > > > > > > >              }
> > > > > > > >              image = merged.addBand(alphaChannel, false, true,
> > > > > > > > null).getRenderedImage();
> > > > > > > >          }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I could also create a pull request (from
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/irisiflimsi/geotools) and an issue for it,
> > if
> > > > you
> > > > > > > > prefer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> > > > > > > > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jody Garnett
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andrea Aime
> 
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> 
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
> ==
> 
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
> 
> GeoSolutions Group
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> 
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
> 
> mob:   +39  333 8128928
> 
> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
> 
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
> 
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail


_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to