I think you have everything correct; it should make a very big difference to performance where in your processing chain you do resampling.
May I ask if resampling is the correct thing to do? What are you trying to accomplish ... - Resampling is usually best for visualization and not necessarily analysis. - Depending on the data being processed - for example DEM, you have to be very comfortable with the inaccuracies introduced. My understanding is these questions are why the WCS protocols allow publishers to control the projections a dataset may be downloaded in for example. I think a raster reproject process would be a useful addition; but caution may be warranted in use. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 01:56, Roar Brænden <roar.brenden...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a way to reproject a Coverage within a process, much the > same way as org.geotools.process.vector.ReprojectProcess. I've looked > through the classes of gt-process-raster, and none of these seem to handle > reprojection. > I see that many of the raster processes are using Coverage Operations. > Among them I find the org.geotools.coverage.processing.operation.Resample > being an adequate class to use for reprojections. > > My questions are: > > Am I right in that there are no processes doing reprojection of Coverages? > > Are there any considerations I should take before making a process based > on the Resample operation? > > Thanks a lot. > > Best regards, > > Roar Brænden > > > > _______________________________________________ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
