Thanks for putting this together Jody. Only feedback I have, is that while the funding might be split for accounting/allocation purposes, the implementation is an "all or nothing". Otherwise +1
Cheers Andrea On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:35 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the GeoTools budget request for review: > - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/GeoTools-Budget-Request-2023 > > I was going to give the board the option of funding the opengis refactor > project by project; or as a cross-project initiative (whatever they think > is easier). > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 10:34 AM Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I have provided a technical debt wiki page on refactoring org.opengis >>> packages (reversing the work we did to provide the interfaces to start the >>> project) in order to get an idea on the work required and costs involved: >>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Remove-OpenGIS >>> >> >> +1, the current situation is causing problems already in downstream >> projects and Java 11 modules are just going >> to make things worse. Let's get rid of the org.opengis packages >> altogether (also supporting the merge of the API rather than >> the simple package rename, the split between the two packages would look >> artificial once done). >> >> >>> Also after last year I am going to separately suggest an OSGeo budget >>> for "security issues" (as a cross project initiative similar to code >>> sprints). Because 2022 sucked. >>> >> >> Yes please, +1 >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >>
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
