Hi, Thanks for the answer. I have also been using the IDE in the past. Now I'm looking into something new, were a pre-generated javadoc jar could be beneficial. I would have a look at the release scripts to see if I can figure it out myself.
Hilsen Roar > 26. mar. 2024 kl. 09:03 skrev Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>: > > No special reason, I think IDEs are happy enough downloading source (and > generating javadoc tooltios as required). > > I you would find it useful it would be fine to update the release scripts > (which are in versions control). > > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Roar Brænden <roar.brenden...@gmail.com > <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I've been looking at Javadocs, and I see that there are no > -javadoc.jar at the Maven repository repo.osgeo.org <http://repo.osgeo.org/> > for Geotools artifacts. I see from the web site that they are downloadable > from sourceforge.net <http://sourceforge.net/> as a zip-file, but for me it > seems more obvious to download it with Maven from a repository. > > Is there a reason why these aren't published to the repository when releasing > a new project? > > Best regards, > Roar Brænden > > _______________________________________________ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel>
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
