Thanks Jody and Ian for voting. Andrea, Nuno, Simone, Torben, if you could vote or raise any concern that'd be great. It's been 9 calendar days since the proposal, and if possible, I'd like to avoid having to wait for the 15 days established in the project policy for it to be automatically accepted (i.e. if there's any concern it'd be better to tackle it asap since we need to move on for other GeoServer 3 activities).
TIA, Gabe *camptocamp* INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS *Gabriel Roldán* Geospatial Solutions Architect On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:32 AM Ian Turton <ijtur...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Ian Turton > > On Tue, 20 May 2025, 19:45 Gabriel Roldan, <gabriel.rol...@camptocamp.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for >> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the >> GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly >> related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals. >> >> Details are on the Wiki: >> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Adopt-Maven-Bill-of-Materials-Pattern-for-GeoTools >> >> Please review and share your feedback. >> >> Thanks, >> >> *camptocamp* >> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS >> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS >> >> *Gabriel Roldán* >> Geospatial Solutions Architect >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GeoTools-Devel mailing list >> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
