MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.7 X-Originating-IP: 203.209.25.115
>I think that it can be done only modifying LabelCacheDefault class. >Suppose that group option could be 'yes', 'no', or a group name. >With yes and no, behaviour is the actual one. With group name, >LabelCacheDeafult uses a specific map for that group. > >What do you think about that? My original plan for allowing grouping to be turned on/off was to do what you're suggesting above, but i didnt have the time to do all the fancy stuff. It seems you've found a use case for it. You should be able to easily add this in. Just make sure the priority stuff still functions correctly. This should be easy if you just merge all the different hash tables together with the non-grouped list. dave ---------------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
