Hi all,

I am currently working on a GIS monitoring application that has to provide 2D 
view(s) of a dynamic geographic dataset (here a communication network with its 
nodes and links, but also moving vehicles). I belive GeoTools has a lot to 
offer here.
The network is not supposed to move, but the nodes' attributes will change over 
the time and we want to render it accordingly, using SLD rules.


The point here is that most of our data is vector data (except a background 
satellite image) and the complete dataset is not very big, say maximum 500,000 
features in total, but each feature can potentially be updated (at least one 
attribute per feature, maybe more), say every 5s.
In addition, there will be a few static features, most likely coming from 
shapefiles.


Since GIS dataset are usually way bigger and more static, I wonder if the 
streaming renderer is suited for this dynamic usage. If not what would you 
suggest?
Again, if not, how difficult would it be to adapt one of the existing renderers 
to ensure a good performance with higher refresh rates and many changes?


We are actually considering using a memory datastore. Then my second question 
is: is the MemoryDatastore a good option? Or should we implement our own memory 
datastore? Extending the existing MemoryDatastore?


Any suggestions are very welcome.
Thank you.

Olivier

PS: It is the 3rd time I am sending this to the list. The 2 first were with a 
Gmail adress. Do  we still have filtering issues with the Gmail users? 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to