Ciao Andrea, actually I was thinking that when we change this, since I agree that we need to change this, we should defaul to ImageCRS because it could the case of having an image without CRS or an image which is no georectified but only geolocated by a certain numbers of Ground Control Points or the like. This might be non-consistent with Feature but that's hwo people expect things to be hande, IMHO at least :-).
Ciao, Simone ------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President/CEO GeoSolutions http://www.geo-solutions.it Via Carignoni 51 550141 Camaiore (LU) Italy Mobile: +39 333 81 28928 ------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Aime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Simone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Thomas Leduc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] ArcGridReader, GeoTiffWriter, GeoTiffReader, ArcGridWriter > Simone ha scritto: >> This can cause some griefs >> since as of now <ArcGridReader is assuming WGS84 if no CRS is provided. > > I've seen this in world images as well. I do believe the correct > behavior would be not to assume anything, and return a null CRS. > That's what vector datastore do, so it would be consistent. > (it may be my fault if in origin they did return WGS84... well, > I guess I was wrong :-) ) > > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
