On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 10:28 -0400, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Tim Swanson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 23:02 -0400, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi Tim,
> >>
> >> I have a nice table in my training course showing the similarities 
> >> between the new feature model and a type system everyone is familiar 
> >> with ... Java; I will try and include JavaBeans as an example as well so 
> >> you get the idea of how a "popular" dynamic type system handles these 
> >> kinds of issues
> >>     
> Okay let's move the result of our email discussion onto a wiki page;
> - {code}
> 
> This way we can both figure out the answers and if I just answer you 
> with wiki pages we will get some form of notes.
> Cheers,
> Jody

Jody,

Is the wiki page editable by the public? I can't find a link to edit it.

If it isn't, then I have a follow-up question.

I think I've got the difference between types and descriptors now. I
probably don't have it completely down, but I've got at least an
operational knowledge that can be refined through use of the framework.
However, there's an issue that throws a wrench in my whole
understanding.

What is the difference between PropertyType.getName() and
PropertyDescriptor.getName()? The Javadocs take pains to point out that
they are not the same thing, but I don't understand the explanation as
to why.


Thanks,




Tim Swanson 
Software Engineer


Tyler Technologies, Inc.
14142 Denver West Parkway, Suite 155
Lakewood, CO 80401
Phone:  
Fax: 303-271-1930
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.tylertech.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to