> > Great, one works that's all we need. > Hmm, but it leaves a unpleasant feeling ;-)
> I would guess that there's some factory configuration issue that you > could resolve to get hsql to work but it's not worth our time to pursue > that now. > > However, be warned that if you move to Geotools 2.5+ one day, the > situation may be reversed with hsql being the only one that > works---you'll have to see. > Some minutes ago, I switched to GT 2.5. The effect is that hqsql deliveres wrong results (concerning Gauss-Kruger zone 2), while wkt results look plausible. For this I will use GT 2.5. Nearby: Is there any disadvantage using wkt instead of hqsql? Thanks Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
