Hi Jody, So now as you have seen the behaviour, can you tell me what is the
problem? Why those two layers don't overlap in different projections? Is
this a bug or it is meant to happen that way?
2009/9/23 Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
> Hi Rahul:
>
> Your data set seems to be quite far south at -82.493. That far south lat
> long coordinates can be pretty numerically unstable as your example shows.
>
> I went through replacing your CRS definition from your prj file with the
> official definition from the EPSG database and was able to get your two
> rectangles to take on different shapes.
>
> Thanks for attaching the files; you may also wish to compare the result
> with uDig 1.2 M6 vs uDig 1.2 M7 since we upgraded the EPSG code definitions.
>
> Jody
>
>
> On 23/09/2009, at 6:23 PM, Rahul... हम पंछी उन्मुक्त गगन के wrote:
>
> Hi All, I have two shape files, having UTM 11C(EPSg : 32711) and WGS
>> 84(EPSG : 4326) projections. When I open them in a map, then they overlap in
>> the UTM projection, but when I change the projection to WGS 84 then they
>> don't overlap. I don't know whats the problem, because I think, if the
>> layers overlap in one projection then they must overlap in other projections
>> also. Please help in this regard. I am attaching the files for your
>> reference.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Rahul
>> <test reprojection.zip>
>>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Rahul
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
