That is correct for WFS 1.0; you may need to check with Gabriel about the WFS 1.1 code.
We have started using the feature model to generate complex content in the last year; I am not sure if progress has been made on parsing complex content yet. Jody On 23/12/2009, at 3:03 PM, Gold, Joshua K wrote: > Is that a correct statement? After digging in the WFS code for 2 days to > find out why some data wasn’t coming through my FeatureCollection objects, I > found a comment in the > EmfAppSchemaParser. If that is true, what is the appropriate way to write > something to handle complex types? Do I write my own > WFSResponseParserFactory? > > Thanks, > josh gold > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
