Hi John, guess that might be achieved by setting the resulting gridgeometry to be at lower resolution?
Not sure if that is what you wanted. Andrea On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:29 PM, john poole <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a way to call Coverage.resample so that accuracy is > sacrificed for speed? > i.e. can we change the block size from whatever the default is, (9?) to > be something larger? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
