Hi Andrea, here is an example from both. The differences seem to be names (of every single parameter - PROJCS, GEOGCS, SPHEROID, etc), including captialization and parameter naems. The values seem to be identical. Hope this helps, Martin
Geotools: PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA", GEOGCS["ETRS89", DATUM["European Terrestrial Reference System 1989", SPHEROID["GRS 1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101, AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]], TOWGS84[0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0], AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]], PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]], UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295], AXIS["Geodetic longitude", EAST], AXIS["Geodetic latitude", NORTH], AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]], PROJECTION["Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area", AUTHORITY["EPSG","9820"]], PARAMETER["latitude_of_center", 52.0], PARAMETER["longitude_of_center", 10.0], PARAMETER["false_easting", 4321000.0], PARAMETER["false_northing", 3210000.0], UNIT["m", 1.0], AXIS["Easting", EAST], AXIS["Northing", NORTH], AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"]] ESRI: PROJCS["ETRS_1989_LAEA", GEOGCS["GCS_ETRS_1989", DATUM["D_ETRS_1989", SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]], PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0], UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]], PROJECTION["Lambert_Azimuthal_Equal_Area"], PARAMETER["False_Easting",4321000.0], PARAMETER["False_Northing",3210000.0], PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",10.0], PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",52.0], UNIT["Meter",1.0]] On 5/20/2010 3:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Martin Tomko ha scritto: >> Hi Andrea, >> I just had the need to export some featurecollesction and check for >> the correctness of results in ArcGis with some other data, as a quick >> visualization workaround - I don't do visualization in GT...(I guess >> I should use uDig for this, eh?). Anyway, this has resulted in an >> error from the prj. so I googled it and asked. >> It is not critical for me now, and I also think we should stick with >> the official database. >> >> Not sure what else could be done... I do not have the time and >> resources to figure a patch, but I guess that an optional parameter >> to newDataStore.forceSchemaCRS(crs, "authority"); could be done, >> where one could avoid it, defaulting to EPSG, or specify ESRI or >> Oracle or whatever... this would require an additional DB of >> definitions which would be a pain to maintain, I guess... > > What I think could be doable is a global hint setting the style of > WKT to be generated. We have lists of aliases for projection and > datum names for ESRI style that could be used to generate WKT in > the specified flavor. > > Past that I don't really know what exactly the differences are. > Do you have an example? I don't use ESRI software so I don't know how > 3035 looks the ESRI way > > Cheers > Andrea > > > -- Martin Tomko Postdoctoral Research Assistant Geographic Information Systems Division Department of Geography University of Zurich - Irchel Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland email: martin.to...@geo.uzh.ch site: http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~mtomko mob: +41-788 629 558 tel: +41-44-6355256 fax: +41-44-6356848 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
