Thank you once again!

We can mark this thread as "solved" :)

Jiri

On 07/27/2011 02:39 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Yes, the snapshots are in a different repo to the formal releases. See
> here for details:
> http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/faq.html#q-what-is-a-snapshot-version-and-how-do-i-use-it
>
> Enjoy :)
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 27 July 2011 15:36, Jiří Novák<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Thank you very much Michael, that's exactly what I needed, now can I
>> continue coding :-)!
>>
>> Just a last question, what is the correct version to obtain daily snapshots
>> you mentioned?
>> I was trying:
>> <org.geotools.version>8-SNAPSHOT</org.geotools.version>
>> and:
>> <org.geotools.version>8.0-SNAPSHOT</org.geotools.version>
>>
>> ...but none of them worked for me.
>>
>> Do I have just wrong specified version or do I need different repository?
>> <repository>
>> <id>OSGEO GeoTools repo</id>
>> <url>http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools</url>
>> </repository>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jiri
>>
>> On 07/27/2011 02:16 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>>> Hi Jiri,
>>>
>>> You are using the most recent milestone release rather than the
>>> snapshot (daily) version. That explains the spurious logging messages
>>> which were fixed more recently.  The vectorizing code hasn't changed
>>> since the milestone release so you're not missing anything there.
>>>
>>> You won't need to union polygons, dissolve boundaries etc with the
>>> polygons returned by RasterToVectorProcess. Since they are derived
>>> from raster regions there will be no covering intersections or
>>> adjacent polys with the same value.
>>>
>>> To gather the individual polygons from the feature collection and
>>> create a MultiPolygon...
>>>
>>>          SimpleFeatureIterator featureIter = fc.features();
>>>          List<Polygon>    polyList = new ArrayList<Polygon>();
>>>          try {
>>>              while (featureIter.hasNext()) {
>>>                  polyList.add((Polygon)
>>> featureIter.next().getDefaultGeometry());
>>>              }
>>>          } finally {
>>>              featureIter.close();
>>>          }
>>>
>>>          GeometryFactory gf = new GeometryFactory();
>>>          MultiPolygon mp = gf.createMultiPolygon(polyList.toArray(new
>>> Polygon[0]));
>>>
>>> If your input image has a value that you want to treat as outside /
>>> nodata, you can specify this using the outsideValues arg of the
>>> RasterToVectorProcess.process method to avoid creating polygons for
>>> nodata regions. Alternatively you can just vectorize everything and
>>> test the value of the "gridvalue" attribute in the feature collection.
>>> For example...
>>>
>>>              while (featureIter.hasNext()) {
>>>                  SimpleFeature feature = featureIter.next();
>>>                  // skip polygons for outside value 0
>>>                  if (((Number)
>>> feature.getAttribute("gridvalue")).intValue() == 0) {
>>>                      polyList.add((Polygon) feature.getDefaultGeometry());
>>>                  }
>>>              }
>>>
>>> You could also something similar if you have a number of different
>>> grid values and want to create a separate MultiPolygon for each.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2011 12:25, Jiří Novák<[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for leading me :)
>>>>
>>>> Also answering inlines...
>>>>
>>>> On 07/26/2011 11:19 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jiri,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please see my comments inline:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is my code:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         FeatureCollection<SimpleFeatureType,SimpleFeature>      
>>>>>> collection
>>>>>> =
>>>>>>           RasterToVectorProcess.process(cov, band, bounds,
>>>>>> outsideValues,
>>>>>> insideEdges, null);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         FeatureIterator<SimpleFeature>      iterator =
>>>>>> collection.features();
>>>>>>         try {
>>>>>>             while( iterator.hasNext() ){
>>>>>>                 SimpleFeature feature = iterator.next();
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   System.out.println(feature.getDefaultGeometry().getClass());
>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>         finally {
>>>>>>             iterator.close();
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         GeometryFactory gf = new GeometryFactory();
>>>>>>         MultiPolygon mp = gf.createMultiPolygon( collection.toArray(new
>>>>>> Polygon[0]) );
>>>>> Ah... I've given you a bum steer sorry. I hadn't ready your previous
>>>>> email and was thinking you were using the JAITools operator with
>>>>> Collection<Polygon>      output. Sorry about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The RasterToVectorProcess is giving you a SimpleFeatureCollection
>>>>> where the Geometry type is Polygon. Do you want to convert each of
>>>>> these to individual MultiPolygons or combine all of them into a single
>>>>> MultiPolygon ?  I just want to check so that I don't send you off in
>>>>> the wrong direction again :)
>>>>>
>>>> I need to obtain just one MultiPolygon as the combination
>>>> (dissolve/merge)
>>>> of those in SimpleFeatureCollection.
>>>>>> 1) many info logs about EPSG initialization - is there a way to get rid
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> it? E.g. set the geotools log level to warning?
>>>>> Those log messages were recently changed to Level.FINE on trunk
>>>>> (8.0-SNAPSHOT). Are you using the most recent binaries ?
>>>>>
>>>> I hope so, I am using this maven configuration:
>>>> ...
>>>> <!-- === Versions of used frameworks and libraries === -->
>>>> <properties>
>>>>     ...
>>>> <org.geotools.version>8.0-M1</org.geotools.version>
>>>>     ...
>>>> </properties>
>>>>
>>>> <repositories>
>>>> <repository>
>>>> <id>OSGEO GeoTools repo</id>
>>>> <url>http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools</url>
>>>> </repository>
>>>>     ...
>>>> </repositories>
>>>>
>>>> Is the right repository for the latest artifacts?
>>>>
>>>> Jiri
>>>>>> 3) And then it falls at line: "MultiPolygon mp = gf.createMultiPolygon(
>>>>>> collection.toArray(new Polygon[0]) );" raising exception of incorrect
>>>>>> storing (allthought the types seems to correspond).
>>>>> That's because I told you to do the wrong thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to