Nicolas Malleson wrote:

> You got me thinking though, is it possible that there is some manipulation
> of the underlying graph going on in the background? It looks like the
> sub-graphs might be changing the underlying graph somehow (which would
> explain why the rate of success drops as more and more are created), but I
> can't see how they would be doing this. To get the subgraph I use the
> visited nodes and edges in the BasicGraph constructor, but again I don't
> think that this should do anything to the underlying graph.

You should read the source code of the involved GT components in order to 
understand how the traversal works. For me, it wasn't intiutive at the 
beginning but the author clearly had a plan. It just wasn't my plan ;-)

Cheers,

Jan
-- 
>From address is valid until 01.06.2012


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, 
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take 
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the 
tools developers use with it. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to