An easy way to get your fix back in is by attaching it to a bug report. Your
fix will have a *much* better chance of being accepted if it includes a test
case showing the problem; that can then be used to confirm your fix does
something.
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 5 December 2011 at 7:32 PM, Hans Wolffenbuttel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had the same problem on Geotools and have found a working sollution,
> but i don't know how to get my changes into the project.
>
> I have 2 adaptations:
>
> 1. rerouted the type binding for generic types like "doubleList" in
> "org.geotools.xml.impl.ParseExecutor"
> 2. changed the execution mode of
> "org.geotools.gml3.bindings.LinearRingTypeBinding" to prevent that the
> anytype will override the LinearRing result.
>
> addaption nr1:
>
> public void visit(Binding binding) {
> ...
>
> if (Schemas.nameMatches(instance.getDeclaration(), binding.getTarget()))
> {
> //instance binding
> type = instance.getTypeDefinition();
> }
> else {
> //type binding
> type = Schemas.getBaseTypeDefinition(instance.getTypeDefinition(),
> binding.getTarget());
> //******** begin addaption **********
> if (type == null) {
> // when the type is not found, it is probably a generic (version
> independant) component
> // which can be found by using the namespace of the instance instead
> of the generic binding.
> QName qName = new QName(instance.getNamespace(),
> binding.getTarget().getLocalPart());
> type = Schemas.getBaseTypeDefinition(instance.getTypeDefinition(),
> qName);
> }
> //******** end addaption **********
> }
> ...
> }
>
> addaption nr2:
>
>
> public class LinearRingTypeBinding extends AbstractComplexBinding {
> ...
>
> //******** begin addaption **********
> /**
> * Changed BEFORE into OVERRIDE because otherwise the LinearRing will be
> overridden by the anytype
> */
> public int getExecutionMode() {
> return OVERRIDE;
> }
> //******** end addaption **********
>
> ...
> }
>
> I'm new to the Geotools project so I don't know if this will break anything.
> My simple tests with Version 3.1.1 and Version 3.2.1 where succesfull.
> Please respond if this is usefull or if there is already another sollution
> present.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/GML-3-2-parsing-problem-in-GeoTools-2-7-beta1-and-GeoTools-2-6-5-tp5947067p7062260.html
> Sent from the geotools-gt2-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> (http://Nabble.com).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for
developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it
provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.
Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
