OK I found a workaround for the problem.
I wrote a simple method that projects the data from the CRS they are really
in, into the CRS defined by the EPSG code.
Here it is:
public void reproject(DataStore dataStore, String sourceName,
CoordinateReferenceSystem currentCRS, CoordinateReferenceSystem targetCRS)
throws IOException {
SimpleFeatureSource sfs = dataStore.getFeatureSource(sourceName);
SimpleFeatureType schema = sfs.getSchema();
Transaction transaction = new DefaultTransaction("reproject");
try {
MathTransform transform = CRS.findMathTransform(currentCRS,
targetCRS, true);
FeatureWriter<SimpleFeatureType, SimpleFeature> writer =
dataStore.getFeatureWriter(schema.getTypeName(), transaction);
int i=0;
while(writer.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(i++ + ". ================");
SimpleFeature feature = writer.next();
Geometry geometry = (Geometry) feature.getDefaultGeometry();
System.out.println(geometry);
geometry = JTS.transform(geometry, transform);
System.out.println(geometry);
feature.setDefaultGeometry(geometry);
writer.write();
}
writer.close();
transaction.commit();
} catch(IOException | FactoryException |
MismatchedDimensionException | TransformException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
transaction.rollback();
}
}
The arguments are as follows:
dataStore - the connection to postgis and oraclespatial
sourceName - the layer name that will be projected
currentCRS - the CRS that data geometry is stored in
targetCRS - the CRS the geometries will transform into
What I have noticed is that the transformation simply changed the order of X
and Y coordinates.
An example is here:
MULTILINESTRING ((6438680.67 6038236.779999999, 6438682.31 6038237.07,
6438682.78 6038236.880000001, 6438683.83 6038236.050000001))
MULTILINESTRING ((6038236.779999999 6438680.67, 6038237.07 6438682.31,
6038236.880000001 6438682.78, 6038236.050000001 6438683.83))
The first geometry was before the projection.
I think that geotools team should take a look at my example, because
something wrong is going on around those CRS definitions or their
transformations.
My udig uses geotools 9.0 and as I said before - the data looked fine there.
Best regards and thanks for help :)
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Problem-with-reference-systems-transformations-tp5156398p5157261.html
Sent from the geotools-gt2-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
