Quick update: I tried both mappings suggested by Ben with the current
development version of GeoServer (master branch, last commit
6db6bdbb9dc1be9daec066762c2c6bc5f7c7259d), but the result is unchanged
(tried all WFS versions. 1.0.0, 1.1.0 and 2.0.0).
What drives me crazy is that the LandCoverUnit feature type has a
geometry property (a "standard" one, of type gml:GeometryPropertyType),
which is encoded just fine with this mapping:
<AttributeMapping>
<targetAttribute>lcv:geometry</targetAttribute>
<targetAttributeNode>
gml:MultiSurfacePropertyType
</targetAttributeNode>
<sourceExpression>
<OCQL>geom</OCQL>
</sourceExpression>
</AttributeMapping>
I interpret this fact as further evidence that the problem lies in
gmd:polygon not being a gml:GeometryPropertyType, but a
gss:GM_Object_PropertyType... just a guess, though.
Best regards,
Stefano
Il giorno gio, 14/05/2015 alle 10.18 +0200, Stefano Costa ha scritto:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Il giorno gio, 14/05/2015 alle 10.12 +0200, Mauro Bartolomeoli ha
> scritto:
> > Hi Stefano,
> > I remember having the same problem with some tests I did some time
> > ago.
> >
> >
> > Could you please try a more recent version (latest 2.8 SNAPSHOT for
> > example)? Because if I am not wrong, this should have already been
> > fixed.
>
> Sure thing, I'll test it ASAP.
>
> > Also, try with a different WFS version (2.0, 1.1.0) and see if the
> > result is consistent.
>
> Tried both WFS 2.0 and 1.1.0, same result :-(
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mauro
>
> Thanks for the suggestion,
> Stefano
>
> >
> > 2015-05-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Stefano Costa
> > <stefano.co...@geo-solutions.it>:
> > Hi Ben,
> > thanks for your suggestions.
> > Unfortunately, they didn't work for me.
> >
> > > please try using targetAttributeNode to treat this property
> > as a
> > > gml:GeometryPropertyType:
> > >
> > > <AttributeMapping>
> > > <targetAttribute>
> > >
> >
> > lcv:extent/gmd:EX_Extent/gmd:geographicElement/gmd:EX_BoundingPolygon/gmd:polygon
> > > </targetAttribute>
> > >
> > <targetAttributeNode>gml:GeometryPropertyType</targetAttributeNode>
> > > <sourceExpression>
> > > <OCQL>geom</OCQL>
> > > </sourceExpression>
> > > </AttributeMapping>
> >
> > Same result as before, the geometry is encoded as a WKT
> > string.
> >
> > >
> > > This tutorial suggests that you could also map the contained
> > > gml:AbstractGeometry (no need for targetAttributeNode):
> > >
> >
> > https://sites.google.com/site/inspiremappingtutorial/land-use-mapping-details/5-2-spatialplan_mapping-xml
> > >
> > > <AttributeMapping>
> > > <targetAttribute>
> > >
> >
> > lcv:extent/gmd:EX_Extent/gmd:geographicElement/gmd:EX_BoundingPolygon/gmd:polygon/gml:AbstractGeometry
> > > </targetAttribute>
> > > <sourceExpression>
> > > <OCQL>geom</OCQL>
> > > </sourceExpression>
> > > </AttributeMapping>
> >
> > This configuration produces an empty gml:AbstractGeometry tag
> > nested
> > inside a gmd:polygon tag:
> >
> > <lcv:extent>
> > <gmd:EX_Extent>
> > <gmd:geographicElement>
> > <gmd:EX_BoundingPolygon>
> > <gmd:polygon>
> > <gml:AbstractGeometry/>
> > </gmd:polygon>
> > </gmd:EX_BoundingPolygon>
> > </gmd:geographicElement>
> > </gmd:EX_Extent>
> > </lcv:extent>
> >
> > I forgot to mention I'm using GeoServer 2.6.2, so GeoTools
> > 12.2.
> >
> > I'll continue the investigation.
> >
> > >
> > > Please let us know if either of these mappings work for you.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Ben.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Stefano
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > One dashboard for servers and applications across
> > Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you
> > Actionable Insights
> > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM
> > Insight.
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> > _______________________________________________
> > GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
> > GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
> GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
