Sean,

  I think geophysicists, geologists, geomatics engineers, geodesists, 
surveyors, remote sensing specialists, geographers, urban planners, 
oceanographers, meteorologists, (is there no end to this list?!?) are always 
looking for better tools/methods to visualize spatial data.  And I think they 
should.

  As for Mike G's comments, I'll quote the downhill skiing adage: "if you're 
not falling down, you're not going fast enough" (hopefully their "mistakes" are 
not life-threatening).  But he is spot-on about critical thinking.

  And to answer the question in the subject line, I suspect geophysicists just 
wank on a different level...

Brent Fraser


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would not normally spam the list with one of my own blog posts, but I'd 
> love to get thoughts from the list on the topic.
> 
> http://blog.fortiusone.com/2008/11/14/geophysics-vs-geography-divergent-viewpoints-on-the-geoweb/
> 
> In short it seems the geophysicists have really embraced geowanking type 
> things - check out their special session on spinny globes:
> 
> http://conferences.images.alaska.edu/agu/2008/index.htm
> 
> Now compare this to Mike Goodchild's quote in the latest ArcNews:
> 
> “In 2005, Google Earth was released, and people with little or no background 
> in GIS, geography, or cartography began using it and other similar services 
> to discover the power of map making. Some even began calling themselves 
> neogeographers. Suddenly it was possible to do some powerful things with 
> geospatial data without committing to what was often a difficult and lengthy 
> learning process….But mistakes (by neogeographers) were and are being made, 
> as often happens when powerful technology is put in the hands of people with 
> little background in its underlying concepts and little experience in 
> thinking critically about its products.”
> 
> I have a lot of respect for Mike's academic work but this seemed a bit over 
> the top.
> 
> Any thoughts or response?
> 
> best,
> sean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to