Interesting, and a really neat data source! But I think the mail layer doesn't really show repopulation, although it could be changed to give a better picture.
The colour range represents population density, per area in 2008 - zoom in and you can see as a label, values for 2005 compared with 2008. So, the map of mail deliveries gives no indication about whether neighbourhoods are being repopulated. Possibly a more revealing map would show the difference between these two figures (subtracting the figures shown on the labels) to see which areas have grown, and shrunk? Tim On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:42 PM, James Fee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The GNOCDC has a presentation about the process: > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/denicew/postal-data-google-maps-shine-light-on-new-orleans-recovery-presentation > > > > > > -- > James Fee > RSP Architects Ltd. > 502 South College Avenue, Suite 203, Tempe, AZ 85281 > 480-889-2095 (w) > > 602-819-2142 (m) > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracey P. Lauriault > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Geowanking] Repopulation Indicators for New Orleans - > InterestingDemographics > > > > http://www.gnocdc.org/repopulation/index.html > > Repopulation Indicators for New Orleans > > -- > Tracey P. Lauriault > 613-234-2805 > https://gcrc.carleton.ca/confluence/display/GCRCWEB/Lauriault > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org > > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
