My contribution:

Animation of bus arrivals in Portland, Oregon:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ewedistrict/2549055956/in/photostream/
4-D structure of BART schedules in the bay area:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ewedistrict/3277827552/sizes/l/
Screenshot of the forthcoming on-the-fly transitshed app:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ewedistrict/3237493360/sizes/o/

Cheers
B

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Mano Marks <[email protected]> wrote:
> This one is pretty cool:
> https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/xythoswfs/webview/_xy-11704186_1?stk=1F2B268E1C6B509
>
> There's of course a ton of KML time animations that work in Earth. I
> particularly like:
> http://www.usna.edu/Users/oceano/pguth/website/so432web/projects/battle_of_bulge.kmz
> http://www.gelib.com/us-statehood.htm
>
>
> 2009/2/13 Chris Goad <[email protected]>:
>>>Returning to the topic at hand. I question if animation is necessary to
>>> convey temporal dimensions in a data set.  >Temporal data can be presented
>>> as a series of small multiples, a la Tufte:
>> Aggregating temporal variation into a static display involves a kind of
>> abstraction missing from animation, and that abstraction often
>> allows perception of temporal structure which would not be apparent from
>>  passing moments.  The Minard illustration of the Napoleon's Russian
>> campaign cited by Tufte ( http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/posters ) is a
>> famous example. The same point applies to  any simple graph of a quantity
>> over time with time displayed on one axis.  But often the quantity of data
>> is excessive or the means for abstraction are not available (this applies
>> for the most part to ordinary life as lived!).  Here's an example that I
>> worked on a few years ago where a slider drives a variety of different kinds
>> of information display, which individually might be subject to temporal
>> abstraction of some kind, but not collectively.
>>
>>
>> http://www.lewisandclarknw.com/map/flashindex.html
>>
>>
>>
>> (Please forgive mentioning my own work).
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: sophia parafina
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Cool Temporal Animations
>> Returning to the topic at hand. I question if animation is necessary to
>> convey temporal dimensions in a data set.  Temporal data can be presented as
>> a series of small multiples, a la Tufte:
>>
>> http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2005/12/images/1severe-storm-animation.gif
>>
>> Alternatively, something as simple as making use of a browser's scroll bar
>> can also convey temporal changes:
>>
>> http://www.simonhoegsberg.com/we_are_all_gonna_die/slider.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM, P Kishor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:34 AM, sophia parafina <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > may I suggest chrononanism as a more mellifluous term?
>>>
>>>
>>> What brilliance and mellifluent. Chrononanism, goes hand over fist
>>> with temporiapism. Ahh... the ailments that we men suffer at the alter
>>> of geospatiotemporal.
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Lieberman <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Time animations can be fun, but never seem to me as useful in the end
>>> >> as
>>> >> ways of including time as a dimension, the slider, the timeline, or the
>>> >> timesection (time along one axis, an aggregate spatial dimension such
>>> >> as a
>>> >> path or list of places along the other.).
>>> >>
>>> >> Hmm... chronobopping?
>>> >>
>>> >> --Josh
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org/
>>> Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/
>>> Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) http://www.osgeo.org/
>>> Sent from: Madison Wisconsin United States.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geowanking mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geowanking mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geowanking mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mano Marks
> Geo Developer Advocate
> Google, Inc.
> [email protected]
> http://twitter.com/ManoMarks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to