I apologize for the cross-posting but there are relevant conversations now
on both OSM-talk and geowanking regarding this data.
I just took a quick look at a dozen or so different parks comparing the
federal lands data I linked earlier with the data Andrew Turner just posted.
Unsuprisingly the NPS data is of higher resolution at each of the sites I
checked out, and in a couple of cases the federal lands data has huge
inaccuracies (though it mostly looks like problems with borders between
federal lands). The federal lands data also lacks a projection (appears to
be NAD 1983).

If you use the federal lands data, I also suggest you toss the NPS boundary
data on there and use that where appropriate.

-Tyler Ritchie

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Turner
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Here is a full catalog of NPS GIS data:
>
> http://science.nature.nps.gov/nrdata/index.cfm
>
> particularly: http://science.nature.nps.gov/nrdata/datastore.cfm?ID=47653
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Andrew
> Johnson<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Is there a public data source that contains boundary files for all the
> U.S.
> > National Parks and Forests? Perhaps also state parks?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to